A
culinary Alphabet:
A - Apicius
There is a disheartening moment at too many dinner parties
when some pompous bore solemnly intones ‘I think it was Oscar Wilde
who said…’. Nine times out of ten, it wasn’t. Neither,
indeed, was it Winston Churchill, the other catchall for any half remembered
quote. The sensible diner is well advised to mentally switch off as this
useful warning phrase is spoken.
For those who pontificate about food, at either amateur or professional
level, there is a similar, usefully vague source – Apicius. He is
imagined to be a sage and portly Roman voluptuary, possibly chef to one
of the more colourful Caesars, and gets the blame for any culinary myth
involving tongues, udders, unlikely birdlife, unspeakable bits of otter
or dormice in honey.
It’s time for a little precision.
Apicius was a legendary Roman gourmet of around 100 BC and later became
a nickname for anyone who was a bit handy with the pans. The eponymous
cookbook is a collection of around five hundred recipes of which 200 are
for sauces. It is written in the Latin vernacular to be read by cooks
rather than noblemen and, to the chagrin of Apicius quoters, it appears
to have had more authors than the bible.
At least three Apicii are mentioned by name in the text. The first (C2nd-
C1st BC) is chiefly remembered as an appalling glutton and the third (C2nd
AD) for a way of keeping oysters fresh over long journeys (there is no
record of how he died but acute ptomaine poisoning looks like a fairly
safe bet), but it is the second, Marcus Gavius Apicius (b. 25 AD), who
particularly stands out.
According to Athenaeus, he moved to Miturnae because of its unusually
large prawns. When he heard that bigger prawns could be found in Libya,
he set off by ship to find them but, on meeting Libyan fishermen off the
coast he discovered that he’d been misled vis a vis crustacean
enormity. He turned round and headed home without bothering to land, reasoning
that, unless the food was spectacular, he might as well give the country
a miss. Many of us feel the same way about France.
Between gargantuan dinners, he invented a process for fattening sow’s
livers with figs to produce a kind of foie gras de porc, which is more
than due for revival.
Were this not enough to make Marcus Gavius Apicius an all-time culinary
pin-up, we are told that he blew his entire fortune on banquets and, when
his accountant told him he was living beyond his means and might have
to slow down a little, he killed himself.
Tragically, though each Apicius was fascinating, there is no historical
evidence to prove that any of them actually wrote the book that bears
their name.
|
|
A couple of weeks ago I watched an autopsy. As the result of a series
of rigorous experiments with Chateauneuf du Pape, I found myself slumped
in font of the telly at three in the morning watching a pathologist at
work. As he sawed his Y incision, did my mind drift to the ultimate frailty
of our human shell, the evanescence of our lives; the miracles of the
human biology or even a healthy repulsion? No, I found myself wondering
how he could bear to work with such a shite knife. I mean dammit, the
man had some top kit, people to look after it and, working from rectal
temperature at time of death, it wasn’t even as if the meat had
had time to toughen up. I’d have done a better job with a Stanley
knife.
I’ve got nice knives. I’m not ashamed to admit that they’re
a bit of a fetish. I’ve still got the first Sabatier I inherited,
a Henckels I bought when I got my first job in a pro kitchen, a set of
Globals I won on a cookery show and the four Japanese knives I use every
day - two debas, a yanagiba and an usuba. Before
you ask - no, they are not crafted to fit my hand – I am not yet
worthy.
Sobered up, the following morning, I was able to take a more rational
view on what I’d seen. We work, every day, with tools of incredible
precision and capable of wreaking effortless and appalling damage on flesh.
Most civilians, if they own a sharp knife, chuck it in a drawer, wash
it in the dishwasher and handle it with no more respect than the rolling
pin. A mechanic wouldn’t handle his tools that way and you can’t
really hurt yourself with a spanner. This is why I have rules about my
knives.
I learned the first rule at my grandfather’s workbench long before
I ever stood at a stove. Any tool that’s not in your hand should
be in its appointed place. If it’s not, it’s an accident waiting
to happen.
In an operating theatre, tools are counted in and out of the surgeon’s
hands. Any swab or retractor not accounted for at close is still inside
the patient. Pit crews mount their tools on a board painted with brightly
coloured outlines. If you realise you’ve mislaid a wrench just as
Schumacher hits 200 on the Paddock turn, it’s already too late.
My knives live in a block and on two magnetic strips just to the right
of the sink. I still check that they’re all in place before plunging
my hands into a sink full of soapy washing up. It’s not difficult
to rinse each knife and put it away as you finish with it. It protects
the knives and, though this is obviously less important, it prevents over
helpful guests opening a vein in the washing up.
The second rule comes from workshops, factories, hangers, and pit lanes
the world over but, somehow always seems to get forgotten, even in professional
kitchens. There is a proper tool for every job. Never use the wrong one.
In years of working in kitchens I’ve only ever seen one accident
that stopped me dead in my tracks (remember, I can watch autopsies without
missing a sip). One of the cooks, in the weeds, asked a waitress to help
him out by separating some frozen fishcakes. She decided to do it with
the first thing to hand - a serrated bread-knife. The results of extreme
force exerted on a serrated blade, on a finger joint are best left un-imagined.
Today, I’m officially adding a third rule.
Until last week, I had not cut myself in the kitchen for as long as I
could remember. Now I’m no longer paid for it, there’s no
need to chop at lightning speeds. Lacking the constant practice of exacting
daily prep, my knife skills have atrophied to a comfortable and relaxed
competence. Consequently on a relaxed and pleasant afternoon, I was completely
sanguine about juilienning a bag of carrots.
I like music in the kitchen. I used to keep a little stack of suitably
inspiring CDs in the kitchen; you know the sort of thing, Louis Prima
singing ‘Angelina’, Dean Martin in ‘jolly Neopolitan’
mode, a bit of Cosi Fan Tutti and perhaps some Handel for the larger beef
joints, but now I have an iPod.
I was, as winter sun arced through the kitchen window and the warm smell
of fresh bread rose from the oven, experimenting with the ‘shuffle’
function when Noel Coward broke into ‘Mad Dogs and Englishmen’.
It is a song I particularly like and one that, such are the delights of
the shuffle, I wasn’t expecting. I launched a particularly spirited
rendition and, paying too little attention, picked up the wrong knife.
It was only the tip of the thumb and a half moon section of the nail but
Christ, it hurt!
Rule three. Know your music when using knives. Well-known compilations,
where you’re singing the opening bars of the next track before the
last has finished, are absolutely fine but anything involving the word
‘random’ has no place in the kitchen.
I just read an ad for kitchen units with the offer of a free ‘flip-down
flat screen and DVD player’. A whole new world of distraction has,
suddenly, to be dealt with. OK, ‘Goodfellas’ might work if
you’re knocking out pasta and I’m intrigued by the idea of
constructing an enormous, phallic crocquembouche while watching ‘Dangerous
Liaisons’ but if I ever have to watch a Adam Sandler movie while
having anything to do with sharp knives and boiling fat I won’t
be responsible for my actions.
|
|